Home›Childcare›Audited financial statements
CWELCC guide · November 2026
Your audit opinion does not say your costs were eligible.
An audit says the statements present your finances fairly. It does not say the money went on things CWELCC pays for — and the province's own review instructions tell service managers to ask whether the work tested program compliance or only accounting standards. That gap is why a clean opinion and a recovery notice can arrive in the same spring. The audit is still the thing you cannot skip: with eight weeks to a December 31 year end, this is the point at which the engagement is arranged and the chart of accounts either does or does not produce the notes your service manager is going to want.
Where the requirement comes from
Not from the Ministry. From whoever sends you the money.
It is worth being clear about this, because operators are often told the province requires an audit. It does not. The Ministry of Education's Chapter 1 funding guideline puts duties on the service manager, not on you: monitor the use of funds with the licensee annually, "reconcile licensee use of funds and recover funds as required," and keep a comprehensive reconciliation process that is documented, retained and subject to ministry review. Identified unused funds "must be recovered from licensees within two years of the claim being discovered." The audited statements the guideline names are the service manager's own, due to the ministry five months after its year end.
What you owe at year end comes from two separate places, and they are easy to confuse:
- Your funding agreement and your service manager's guideline. This is what makes an audit compulsory for a CWELCC centre, and it is local. Peel, Halton and Toronto each set their own statement type, deadline, note disclosures and auditor conditions.
- Corporate law. Separate question, separate answer, and for a non-profit it has its own thresholds — which a funder is free to override, and does.
Add the Ministry's own year-end report on top. You prepare the Standardized Financial Report for each eligible centre or agency, with a signed annual attestation, covering January to December even where that is not your fiscal year. Your service manager assesses it, reconciles it and passes the data up; for 2025 the service managers' own target date to the ministry was the first Monday in June. Working papers behind the SFR have to be kept and produced on request.
The short version
In Peel, a December 31 year end is mandatory and audited statements plus the FAIR are due within four months — April 30. Statements are consolidated at the organization level; the FAIR is site by site.
In Toronto, audited statements are "always required" for CWELCC, due within four months, with eligible costs set out per centre in the Appendix III format.
In Halton, they are due within 120 days of your own fiscal year end, with notes showing each early years funding received, spent and repayable.
Everywhere: only an accountant holding an Ontario public accounting licence can issue the report.
Three service managers, three regimes
What each one actually asks for.
| In Peel | In Toronto | In Halton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal year end | December 31 is a mandatory condition of CWELCC funding; exemptions granted only in limited circumstances | Your own; the 2026 cycle covers year ends from June 30, 2025 to May 31, 2027 | Your own |
| Deadline | Within four months of fiscal year end — April 30 for December 31 | Within four months of the agency's fiscal year end | Within 120 days of fiscal year end — April 30, 2027 for December 31, 2026 |
| Audited, or something less | Unaudited statements only if you are not enrolled in CWELCC and receive under $150,000 in the year | "Always required" for CWELCC; thresholds apply to other funding; only Summer Day Funding may be unaudited | Audited, annually, for operators receiving CWELCC funding |
| Level | Statements consolidated at the organization level; the FAIR at site level | Thresholds tested at agency level; eligible costs reported for each individual centre | Segmented revenue and expense breakdown for Halton sites |
| Sent to | Emailed to Peel's Early Years System Division as a package with the FAIR | Online Services for Operators, Applications, Financial tab | childcareservices@halton.ca |
| If you are late | Sanctions under the Compliance Policy, and you cannot apply for One-time Emergency Funding | Reporting default; recoveries appealed within 10 business days, paid within 30 days | May result in holds on future payments or termination of the agreement |
Toronto is the only one of the three that publishes dollar thresholds, and they are worth reading if you hold more than one funding stream. For 2026: CWELCC, EarlyON and Family Centres and Indigenous-Led Child and Family Programs mean audited statements with no threshold at all. Fee Subsidy, General Operating Funding and the Agency Operating Fund trigger them at $30,000 a year, "any single or combination that adds up to the Financial Threshold." Provincial Wage Enhancement, 1999–2005 Pay Equity, Supplemental Capital Funding, Summer Day Funding and Every Child Belongs trigger them at $20,000 on the same combined basis. So a small centre with fee subsidy and wage enhancement money but no CWELCC can be inside the audit net on $30,000 of funding.
A review engagement is a narrower option than most operators assume. Toronto's 2026 reconciliation guideline does not mention review engagements at all; the posted 2024 Audit Guidelines allowed one only for agencies whose City funding was limited to wage enhancement and the Home Child Care Enhancement Grant. Peel's route to something less than an audit runs through not being in CWELCC. Halton's 2026 guideline offers no review-engagement alternative. If you are a CWELCC centre, assume an audit.
One Peel rule to check before you plan anything else: you must not change or delay aligning to a December 31 year end without Peel Region's prior written approval, and where an exemption exists you owe more rather than less. Peel's reporting update sets out both halves: within four months of your own year end, audited statements plus an audited January-to-December statement of revenue and expenditures and an updated FAIR to match; and by April 30, an unaudited January-to-December statement of revenue and expenditures with the FAIR for the calendar year. A consolidated statement of revenue and expenditures covering all your Peel CWELCC sites is required in that situation and where you operate across more than one municipality.
The other audit question
A non-profit centre is almost certainly a public benefit corporation.
Corporate law asks a different question from your funder, and for a non-profit it is answered under the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010. The first step is the one centres skip. A corporation is a public benefit corporation if it is charitable, or if in a financial year it received more than $10,000 in donations or gifts from people who are not members, directors, officers or employees, or in grants or similar financial assistance from a government. CWELCC funding is government funding, and no CWELCC centre receives as little as $10,000 of it. So a non-profit child care corporation enrolled in CWELCC is a public benefit corporation, and the stricter column applies:
- Annual revenue of $500,000 or more: an audit is mandatory. There is no waiver.
- Over $100,000 and under $500,000: members can waive the audit, but a review engagement is still required.
- $100,000 or less: members can waive both.
Waiving takes an extraordinary resolution — at least 80% of the votes cast at a special members' meeting, or the written consent of all voting members — and it lasts only until the next annual meeting, so it is a decision the board makes again every year. The person appointed must be permitted to do the work under the Public Accounting Act, 2004 and must be independent. Those thresholds can be changed by regulation.
Two practical consequences. First, most centres of any size are over $500,000 of annual revenue once CWELCC funding, fee subsidy and parent fees are added together, so the corporate requirement and the funding requirement point the same way and the question never arises. Second, where a small centre or a home child care agency is under the line, the waiver buys nothing: Peel, Halton and Toronto each require audited statements of a CWELCC operator regardless, and a funding agreement overrides a corporate-law exemption every time. If the centre is a for-profit corporation, nothing in corporate law makes you have an audit at all — the whole requirement comes from the funding agreement.
If your centre is a non-profit, the tax filings are a third separate matter again: an incorporated non-profit exempt under paragraph 149(1)(l) still files a T2, and adds a T1044 only if it meets one of the CRA thresholds. Our not-for-profit and charity page and the December 31 year-end checklist set those out.
Who can sign it
Not every CPA can issue an audit report.
This is the detail that derails more December conversations than any other. Under the Public Accounting Act, 2004, the lead engagement person signing an audit or review report on financial statements must hold a public accounting licence. Plenty of excellent CPAs — including people who have done a centre's books for years — do not hold one, because a licence is a separate credential requiring its own experience and annual renewal. CPA Ontario publishes a public accountants directory, so the licence can be checked before an engagement letter is signed rather than in April.
Each service manager says the same thing in its own words:
- In Peel, only accountants with a public accounting licence may issue an Independent Audit Report.
- In Toronto, the auditor must be licensed to perform audit engagements in Ontario, and only licensed public accountants may issue the independent audit engagement report. Toronto also asks the agency to verify the licence itself.
- In Halton, the auditor must hold a CPA designation registered in Ontario with a public accounting licence, must be independent under CPA Ontario's Rules of Professional Conduct, and neither the auditor nor an immediate family member may be a director, officer or board member of the operator or hold a financial interest in it.
Halton's last condition catches a real pattern: the board member who is an accountant and has been signing off the statements as a favour. That arrangement has to end before the engagement starts.
On the bookkeeping side, independence rules restrict the audit firm from also keeping your books rather than flatly forbidding it, and the practical division both Toronto and Peel describe is the ordinary one — the bookkeeper records the transactions, the licensed public accountant forms the opinion as an independent third party, and the operator remains responsible for compliance. We keep books, payroll and the reconciliation for centres and agencies, and coordinate the audit with an independent auditor we work with. We do not issue the opinion.
Who signs on your side is also specified. In Toronto, a non-profit needs two authorized signing officers who are board members listed on Schedule A — a supervisor or executive director is not a board member, so their signature alone is not accepted — plus AGM minutes each year; a commercial agency needs an authorized representative with legal signing authority, such as an owner or director. In Halton the annual attestation is signed by an officer with appropriate signing authority, and the Ministry's SFR attestation works the same way.
The notes
The note disclosure is the part your auditor cannot invent in April.
All three service managers want the same four statements — financial position, operations, change in equity or net assets, and cash flows — plus notes. The notes are where the funding actually gets reported, and the format is prescribed.
In Peel, audited statements must be prepared in accordance with the Region's Accounting and Note Disclosure Guideline, which the 2026 centre-based guideline points accountants and auditors to by name at section 12.2, and must carry a note disclosure for each award received during the calendar year. Peel's own reporting update describes the content as the amount received, the amount spent, and the amount overspent or repayable to Peel. If you have not been sent a copy of that guideline, ask your Early Years Specialist for it before the engagement, not after the draft statements arrive.
In Toronto, Appendix III sets out the layout, in columns per centre plus a total: program staff (A), supervisors (B), accommodations (C), operations (D), the total before approved one-time unexpected costs (E, being A + B + C + D), the actual cost covered by approved one-time unexpected costs (F), and the total after, as E − F. Note the sign: one-time unexpected costs are taken out, because they are reconciled separately and are not eligible costs for cost-based funding — the same treatment described in our guide to emergency repairs and major capital. A second table reports the actual base fee revenue offset split between revenue from families and revenue from fee subsidies, by centre. Either put this in the notes or in a supplementary schedule reviewed by the auditors. Toronto's warning is explicit: where the figures differ significantly from the SFR and the annual attestation, it may request an additional agency-level recovery.
In Halton, the notes must show CWELCC and other early years funding received, spent and repayable, separately from other funding sources, and expenditures must be separated for the CWELCC-eligible part of the business — children aged 0 to 5. A multi-site operator provides a segmented breakdown for its Halton sites; an operator across several jurisdictions, or a consolidated large organization, provides a separate revenue and expense statement for its Halton centres; an operator funded by more than one service system manager provides a segmented breakdown; and a home child care agency includes expenditures for all of its providers.
Three further content rules are easy to miss and expensive to retrofit. Toronto requires each City funding type to be reported separately — fee subsidy, base fee revenue, general operating funding, CWELCC cost-based funding, the CWELCC start-up grant, the CWELCC Infrastructure Fund, Professional Learning Strategy funding and other City funding — and requires salary and benefit expenses to be shown separately from other costs. Its 2026 guideline also requires eligible costs and offsets to follow the Appendix III and SFR categories, failing which a separate reconciliation audit report is needed. And related-party relationships and transactions must be disclosed in the statements, including transactions with no recognized amount: the balances, the measurement basis and any contractual obligations. Both Peel and Halton require funding receipts and disbursements to sit in distinct subaccounts in the general ledger, with regular internal reconciliations against it.
All of that is a chart-of-accounts decision, not an audit decision. A ledger that posts every grant to "government funding" and every wage to "salaries" cannot produce a note that separates eight funding types, splits 0-to-5 from 6-to-12, and reports four cost categories per site. In April there is nothing to do but rebuild a year of coding from invoices, which is where most recoveries we see start.
Where it goes wrong
Six things that turn a clean audit into a recovery.
- Treating the opinion as a compliance finding. The province's assessment instructions tell service managers to consider who prepared the SFR and "whether the review tested program compliance or only accounting standards," and to confirm the scope of any accountant's work. An audit under Canadian Auditing Standards is not a statement that your costs were eligible, and nobody should read it as one.
- Amortization and loan principal. Amortization is only claimable where the asset was bought on or before August 14, 2024 and is not capital renewal and has not been funded or claimed elsewhere. Toronto's 2026 guideline adds, as new, that the principal portion of a loan is an ineligible cost. Both are ordinary accounting entries that have to be stripped out of eligible costs.
- Financing costs above the benchmark. The Ministry's review list flags interest beyond Canada Small Business Financing Program rates — prime plus 3% on a term loan, prime plus 5% on a line of credit — with federal and Ontario government loans exempt. Refinance in the year and this moves.
- Leaving approved one-time costs in eligible costs. The Appendix III total deducts them. An operator who funded a roof through One-time Emergency Funding and left the cost in the program figures has overstated eligible costs in the one place a reviewer can see it.
- A qualified opinion. Where the auditor cannot obtain sufficient evidence, a qualification for limitation of scope follows. Toronto reviews the qualification against its own guidelines, may ask for more information, and may apply sanctions. A scope limitation is usually a records problem that was fixable in the autumn.
- Assuming a restatement is recoverable. Toronto says plainly that restated statements are funded by the agency and are not an eligible cost. The second set of statements comes out of your own money.
From 2026 both Peel and Halton run direct engagement compliance work on a 5% sample of eligible centres and agencies, performed by an independent third-party auditor; Halton's is under CSAE 3531 and verifies that offsetting revenue and claimed costs were eligible. Toronto's 2026 guideline adds a direct engagement to report on compliance as a new possibility rather than a fixed sample. Peel's reviews can look back up to seven years, and supporting documentation has to be kept for seven years in both Peel and Halton. That is covered in our guide to compliance engagements and cost reviews.
Dates
What happens between now and next spring.
| When | What |
|---|---|
| November and December 2026 | Engage a licensed public accountant and check the licence; fix the chart of accounts so funding streams, sites and the 0-to-5 split come out of the ledger rather than out of a spreadsheet in March |
| December 31, 2026 | Fiscal year end — mandatory in Peel, and the calendar year the SFR covers wherever you are |
| January 31, 2027 | In Peel: School-Age, Program Staff Top-up and Life Long Learning Day reconciliations |
| First quarter 2027 | In Toronto: the SFR, on the date Children's Services sets |
| March 31, 2027 | Service managers' cost review reports go to the ministry for the 2026 funding year |
| April 30, 2027 | In Peel: audited statements, the FAIR and CWELCC reconciliation. In Halton: audited statements, being 120 days after a December 31 year end. In Toronto: audited statements, being four months after a December 31 year end |
| Four months or 120 days after a non-December year end | In Toronto and Halton, your own deadline moves with your year end — a June 30, 2026 year end was due in Halton on October 28, 2026 |
| First Monday in June 2027 | Service managers aim to submit SFR data to the ministry |
Full deadline detail by service manager, including the Peel communications in January and February, is in CWELCC deadlines for Peel, Halton and Toronto.
Questions we get asked
Does the province require our centre to have an audit?
No. The Ministry of Education's Chapter 1 funding guideline places the duties on your service manager — monitor the use of funds annually, reconcile licensee use of funds and recover funds as required, and keep a documented reconciliation process subject to ministry review. The audited statements it requires are the service manager's own. The audit requirement on your centre comes from your funding agreement and your service manager's guideline, which is why it is different in Peel, Halton and Toronto.
Can we file a review engagement instead?
If you are a CWELCC centre, assume not. Toronto's 2026 reconciliation guideline requires audited statements wherever a threshold is met and says they are "always required" for CWELCC, with Summer Day Funding the only unaudited exception; the review-engagement option in its posted 2024 Audit Guidelines was for agencies whose City funding was limited to wage enhancement grants. Peel allows unaudited statements only where you are not enrolled in CWELCC and receive under $150,000 in the year. Halton's 2026 guideline offers no alternative to an audit.
Our accountant does our books and our T2. Can they do the audit?
Only if they hold an Ontario public accounting licence, which is a separate credential from the CPA designation and is not something every CPA has. Peel, Toronto and Halton all require the report to come from a licensed public accountant, and CPA Ontario publishes a directory you can check. Independence rules also restrict the firm that audits you from keeping your books, and in Halton the auditor and their immediate family cannot be a director, officer or board member or hold a financial interest in the operator. The usual division is that the bookkeeper records the transactions and the licensed public accountant forms the opinion.
We are a small non-profit. Can our members waive the audit?
Under the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 a public benefit corporation with revenue of $500,000 or more cannot waive it; between $100,000 and $500,000 the members can waive the audit by extraordinary resolution but must still have a review engagement; at $100,000 or less they can waive both. A non-profit centre receiving CWELCC funding is a public benefit corporation, because the test includes receiving more than $10,000 of government grants in a financial year. Even where the waiver is available it does not help, because your service manager requires audited statements anyway.
Does the audit have to be site by site?
It depends where you are, and the two halves of the Peel answer get mixed up. In Peel the audited statements are consolidated at the organization level and it is the FAIR that is completed site by site — while reconciliation and any recovery are determined at site level, and funding allocated to one site cannot cover another site's costs. In Toronto the thresholds are tested at agency level but eligible costs must be reported for each individual centre in the Appendix III format. In Halton a multi-site operator provides a segmented revenue and expense breakdown for its Halton sites, and an operator working across jurisdictions provides a separate statement for its Halton centres.
What happens if the statements are late?
In Peel, late or incomplete audited statements and FAIR attract sanctions under the Compliance Policy and make you ineligible to apply for One-time Emergency Funding. In Halton, failing to meet the format or the deadline may result in holds on future payments or termination of agreements, and an extension has to be requested from your Quality and Accountability Specialist. In Toronto, failing to report within the required time is a reporting default. None of the three treat the deadline as advisory.
The auditor gave us a qualified opinion. Does that matter?
Yes. Toronto's guideline says a qualified or reservation opinion may be given where the licensed public accountant cannot obtain sufficient evidence, that Children's Services will review the qualification against its guidelines, and that it may lead to further review and sanctions. A scope limitation is usually a records problem — missing invoices, untraceable payroll allocations, no documentation behind an overhead split — and all of those are fixable before year end rather than after.
The audit note does not match our SFR. Is that a problem?
In Toronto it is specifically flagged: where the figures in the note disclosure differ significantly from the SFR and the annual attestation, Children's Services may request an additional agency-level recovery. The two reports are built from the same ledger and should tie out, so a difference usually means one of them was assembled separately. Reconcile the note to the SFR before either is filed.
Sources: Ontario Ministry of Education, Chapter 1: Funding Guideline (July 2026) — section 2.I (business practices with licensees, reconciliation and the two-year recovery rule) and section 2.D (the service manager's own financial statements reporting); Ontario Ministry of Education, Standardized Financial Report and Cost Reviews Requirements (April 2026) — sections 1.B to 1.F (who prepares the SFR and the attestation, the January-to-December basis, working papers, the assessment list including program-compliance scope, related-party transactions, compensation to controlling owners, amortization, Canada Small Business Financing Program rates, and the submission dates) and Part 2 (cost reviews); Chapter 2 Division 2: CWELCC Cost-Based Funding Guideline (July 2026); Region of Peel, 2026 CWELCC funding guideline, centre-based — section 2.1 (December 31 year end, audited statements and FAIR by April 30) and section 12.2 (the Accounting and Note Disclosure Guideline, consolidated statements and site-level FAIR); Region of Peel, Early Years and Child Care Service Provider Handbook (August 2026) — financial reporting requirements (the four-month deadline, the $150,000 non-CWELCC threshold, the public accounting licence, note disclosures per award, the consolidated statement of revenue and expenditures, the mandatory December 31 year end and Appendix H exemptions, seven-year retention and distinct subaccounts), the compliance mechanisms (direct engagements from 2026, reviews covering up to seven years) and Appendix D, the Compliance Policy; Region of Peel, CWELCC reporting and reconciliation update, centre-based (August 2025) — the note disclosure of amounts received, spent and repayable, and the non-December year-end submissions; Toronto Children's Services, 2026 Funding Reconciliation Guidelines (updated October 2026) — sections 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 3.1 to 3.5, 3.9, 5.2 and 5.7, and Appendices II, III and VI; Toronto Children's Services, 2024 Audit Guidelines — the review engagement option for wage-enhancement-only agencies; Halton Region, CWELCC guidelines for child care operators (April 2026) — section 7 (audited financial statements, the 120-day deadline and Table 8, content and segmentation requirements, auditor qualifications and independence, seven-year retention and the direct engagement sample) and section 8 (the annual attestation and reconciliation); Halton Region, Early Years and Child Care Funding Agreement 2026–2031 — section 8.1 (audited statements, GAAP, record retention, internal reconciliations and distinct subaccounts) and Schedule D; Ontario's guide to the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 — the public benefit corporation definition and the audit and review engagement thresholds in section 76, and the independence requirement in section 69; CPA Ontario, public accounting licence — which engagements require a licence under the Public Accounting Act, 2004, and the public accountants directory. Amounts are Canadian dollars. Requirements differ by service manager and change between funding years; confirm anything you are relying on with your own service manager and your auditor. General information, not advice for your situation.
Year end is eight weeks away.
Call 647-870-8498 or email info@ghayurtax.com. We keep the books, payroll and reconciliations for licensed centres and home child care agencies in Peel, Halton and Toronto, set the ledger up so the note disclosures come out of it, and coordinate the audit with an independent auditor we work with.